Theoretical Considerations
L'impersonnalisation créatrice
Abstract
As a true supporter of objective and laborious writing, resulting from hard work and not from divine inspiration, Flaubert totally opposes subjectivity in literary works as, in his opinion, depersonalization gives literature the force to exist without any other additions besides the form and the content. Poïeticien even before this term was invented, Flaubert understood that, during the creation of a literary work, the writer should forget himself, let the work create itself through him and hide everything connected to his biographical self. This is how the perfectly lucid consciousness of the modern writer emerges. Such consciousness, such creative depersonalization contributes to achieving a true revolution, not only of the literary form, but also in the entire literature. Flaubert's correspondence, a genuine « poïetic art », does not explain his work. It does explain how the conscious and impersonal poïen generates more value.
Keywords —
poïétic · depersonalization · creation · art · awarenessCite this article
Stanciu-Capotă, R. (2001). L'impersonnalisation créatrice. Dialogos, 03, 7–10.
Stanciu-Capotă, Rodica. “L'impersonnalisation créatrice.” Dialogos, vol. 03, 2001, pp. 7–10.
Stanciu-Capotă, Rodica. 2001. “L'impersonnalisation créatrice.” Dialogos 03: 7–10.
@article{stanciucapota2001limpersonnalisation,
author = {Stanciu-Capotă, Rodica},
title = {L'impersonnalisation créatrice},
journal = {Dialogos},
year = {2001},
volume = {03},
pages = {7--10}
}TY - JOUR AU - Stanciu-Capotă, Rodica TI - L'impersonnalisation créatrice JO - Dialogos PY - 2001 VL - 03 SP - 7 EP - 10 ER -